Tags
AGRI alternative technology Azerbaijan Bulgaria Carbon CEE Climate change Corruption E.ON Electricity Emfesz energy efficiency Energy Strategy EU Fidesz Finance Firtash Gas Gazprom Hungary investment Koka Mol MVM Nabucco nuclear oil OMV Orban Poland presentation Putin regulation restructuring risk risk governance Romania RosGas Russia shale gas South Stream Surgetneftegaz Surgutneftgas tax USBlogroll
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
Meta
Pages
Tweets of Me & Others
Most Popular Posts
-
Fukuyama gets a letter from paranoid Hungary – but why not me?
05 February 2012 12:21 PM | 1 CommentBut like all state bureaucrats, and even like the Communist censors of the past regime, they miss the point of the article, thereby confirming and reinforcing the message. (Maybe it is at this point that Kovacs was trying to demonstrate that institutions DO matter).
Read More -
Nabucco’s bubble bursts
19 January 2012 1:51 AM | No CommentsNabucco's bubble grew with the momentum built on the concept of security of supply for Europe. For companies and governments who supported the project, their commitment and involvement meant that the momentum needed to be maintained.
Read More -
Why Hungary’s revisionist energy strategy will fail
17 July 2011 4:40 PM | No CommentsFirst, let's have a good laugh. "a competitive state player." While this is an oxymoron, the state can't be a 'competitive' player in a game when it is also the referee.
Read More -
After Fukushima: Assessing nuclear power projects in CEE/SEE
19 March 2011 1:44 AM | No CommentsBe Sociable, Share! TweetTweet
Read More -
The False Energy Accomplishments of Hungarian EU Presidency
20 January 2011 11:45 AM | No CommentsBe Sociable, Share! TweetTweet
Read More -
Hungary to follow Tajik model: Forced donations for Surgut/MOL shares
03 January 2011 9:24 AM | No CommentsBe Sociable, Share! TweetTweet
Read More
-
Recent Posts
-
Short, Short Nabucco Man
21 February 2012 12:48 AM | No CommentsBut a shorter and smaller Nabucco? Is it really the big Nabucco that we know? The pipeline extending from the Caucasus all the way to Austria? Well, no not really. It is another pipeline plan that relies on the Turkish infrastructure (or the jumble of other pipelines that have to be sorted out).
Read More -
Shale gas, time for traditional risk assessment, part II
17 February 2012 2:21 AM | No CommentsAs the technology of fracking improves, the industry becomes more knowledge about the local geology and political/public landscape, and as state institutions introduce regulatory safeguards - responding to public concerns, shale technology will become more widely deployed.
Read More -
Shale gas, not bound by traditional risk assessments? Part I
14 February 2012 2:07 AM | No CommentsTraditional risk analysis demonstrates shale gas is just like you and me - not a superstar Hollywood actor. The debate around shale gas as a 'game changer' needs to give way - including in the media - to a new level of analysis that sees the industry as bound by traditional political-economic risks.
Read More -
Diffusion of Regulatory Governance: the rise of transnational regulatory networks
08 February 2012 6:10 PM | No CommentsBe Sociable, Share! TweetTweet
Read More -
Fukuyama gets a letter from paranoid Hungary – but why not me?
05 February 2012 12:21 PM | 1 CommentBut like all state bureaucrats, and even like the Communist censors of the past regime, they miss the point of the article, thereby confirming and reinforcing the message. (Maybe it is at this point that Kovacs was trying to demonstrate that institutions DO matter).
Read More
-
Nabucco, and the distant love of Europe
Nine lives or no lives? That is the prospect for Nabucco.
Noise or game changing events: another round of alternative pipeline plans, the re-positioning of political actors, makes another act in the Nabucco opera either more intriguing or increases the restlessness of the audience.
Separate actions inflict little wounds on Nabucco but collective cuts may be eroding the ground underneath. Does the U.S. still fully support Nabucco? What’s the purpose and/or reality of the new South East Europe Pipeline project?
Will there be any life for Nabucco?
All these questions lead to separate and diverse perspectives of what the future may hold for Nabucco. The doubts begin to settle in as the relationship between EU backers and the governments in the two distant regions move beyond the courting phase of their relationship and seek to build a solid gas link.
Reassessment of relations
There comes points in a long-term relationship where an assessment of what each partner wants…. is it true love, infatuation or is there a true coupling where each partner brings important elements to the relationship? Europe must decide whether it wants to develop the relationship further with the countries of the Caucases and Central Asia. The recent – warning shot – provided by the U.S. State Department Special Envoy for Eurasian Energy, Richard Morningstar should begin to focus attention in Brussels. The ‘misinterpreted’ comments that smaller pipeline projects that are more commercially viable may be better. While the U.S. embassy rushed out a ‘clarification’ it still states that the sooner a commercially viable pipeline is built the better.
Reality or love
There are always reasons why a relationship will fail over the long term. Particularly when you put two ‘individuals’ together from two different cultures. Maybe now is the right time to review these. What are the worries that prevent countries from the EU to solidify their relation with potential supplier countries for Nabucco?
Financial: ”How are we going to pay for it?”
Distance: “But you are so far, can we really have a long distance relationship?”
Distractions: “What if you find someone else, while I’m away?”
Parental approval: “My mother wouldn’t approve” (i.e. Mother Russia)
“Your father has other plans for you.” (i.e. US wants EU to use shale gas)
Hometown girl: “Maybe you want a girl from home.” (i.e. shale gas)
Like most love story, it is the parents that get in the way. Those guardians that seek to steer their children in the right direction. Mother Russia certainly has a strong interest to insure that the EU is only supplied by Russia. The United States, is attempting to force a gas strategy on Europe – shale gas. The recent Baker Institute Study that projects a drop in European gas dependency from 27% to 13% because of the full utilization of European shale gas, has unfortunately – I believe, influenced US policy to push the EU to delay or stop the Nabucco Pipeline. Therefore comments emerge that discourage investment into Nabucco and encourage switching to a lower capacity pipeline that is commercially viable in the short term. Pursing the most commercially viable pipeline option today does not provide the long term boost to security of supply nor provide the foundation the EU needs to have gas fill its power plants.
Multilateral and multicultural relations are at the heart of everything the EU does. Also central to the EU is the role of energy – the foundation of the EU rests on energy. Providing the will and reasoned justification for building a robust pipeline that will serve the long term interests and needs of Europe requires significant commitment today. Many of the issues that are meant to derail Nabucco are not strong enough to trump the security of supply implications that expanded gas supplies, that are not controlled by Russia, offer. Just as love can overcome obstacles, the large and abstract notion of security of supply serves as the impetus to take resolute steps to cement a relationship. It is time to stop worrying about what the future in-laws think.
About Michael LaBelle
Michael LaBelle provides a critical but light hearted analysis of the complex field of EU and CEE/SEE energy politics and business. He is based in Budapest, Hungary. He can be reached at michael.labelle(at)energyscee.com